Hosted by Dr. Merle Griff and DeLores Pressley. This informative and interactive radio show, Wriggling in the Middle, talks about the dilemmas and sometimes the delights of being part of the sandwich generation and responsible for the care of multiple generations. Whether it's caring for both your children and elderly parents, or an aging spouse and your grandchildren, the show will discuss not only the challenges seen every day in keeping a family together, but also the lighter side of trying to manage it all.
For more information, contact info@wrigglinginthemiddle.com
In a society based on the rule of law, puneihmsnt, if any, should be decided by legal process, not by private revenge. Therefore, in such a case as this, the convicted man, if not executed, must remain in custody for life, as there will undoubtedly be some who wish to harm him.From that point onwards, the case immediately calls to mind the saying that hard cases make bad law’. If a death sentence is mandatory, the defendant being guilty as charged, there seems no alternative to carrying it out. But what does guilty’ mean here, with the man remembering nothing of his criminal actions, and the court acknowledging that fact?However, If I am the equivalent of home secretary, hearing an appeal for mercy’, that implies that I do in fact have the legal power to grant, or at least to recommend, mercy. If I have not, there is no point in allowing an appeal!It would seem to me preferable for the man to remain in custody in humane but frugal conditions, and to do some work which would contribute to his own support and to the good of society in general. My answer therefore is No: I would rule that capital puneihmsnt is not just in this case’.